DNA Monthly (Vol. 15, No. 4)

Subscribe for FREE

Go to Archive Index


July-August 2019 (Vol. 15, No. 4)

Please Take a Second to Help Get My Paintings Shown to Millions of People

“Sol Luckman’s strikingly inspired art shines proudly on the covers of all three of my books published by Inner Traditions (Shamanic Transformations, The Gift of Shamanism, Shamanic Healing). His evocative images, bright unapologetic colors and natural flowing forms complement my writings beautifully and open readers to the primeval mystery of the ageless shamanism.” —Izthak Beery, Publisher, Shamanportal.org

Here’s my online portfolio featuring hundreds of colorful, expressionistic paintings designed to please the eye, uplift the spirit and inspire the imagination.


If you like my stuff, you can help it get displayed on gigantic billboards in front of literally millions of people in Los Angeles and Santa Monica.

Just click on the links below to vote for my three images entered in Pixels’ Billboard Contest:

REUNION by Sol Luckman

GHOST IN THE TREES by Sol Luckman

LAZY POPPY by Sol Luckman

While you’re at it please follow my profile and browse all the unique fine art prints and merchandise I’ve made available.

Art Prints

If you prefer original artworks, these can be purchased—typically with free shipping—here.

Thanks so much for helping me out!

Sol Luckman
Crow Rising Transformational Media
www.CrowRising.com

Sell Art Online

FEATURED IN THE JULY-AUGUST 2019 ISSUE OF DNA MONTHLY

1. How Eating from Each Plant ‘Sphere’ Nourishes the Whole Human Being” by Thomas Cowan, MD

2.
An Open Letter on Internet Censorship” by Dr. Kelly Brogan

3. People Who Support Internet Censorship Are Infantile Narcissists” by Caitlin Johnstone


4.
11 Golden Rules of Militant Vaccine Pushers (Part 1)” by Brendan D. Murphy

5.
Reality Is a Function of State of Mind by Jon Rappoport

Featured Videos ... Why Everyone's Leaving YouTube & Tell No One (Documentary on the Catholic Church in Poland)


1. How Eating from Each Plant “Sphere” Nourishes the Whole Human Being

Thomas Cowan, MD


[Editors Note: Enjoy this fresh perspective from Thomas Cowan, one of the world’s leading holistic medical doctors. Dr. Cowan’s extensive research, resulting in Dr. Cowan’s Garden, “nutritionally powerful and playful vegetable powders,” is a tremendous blessing to those of us endeavoring to heal ourselves, or simply remain healthy, in a global network of deception that has fed us a heaping plate of lies when it comes to the medical potential of food as opposed to pharmaceuticals.]


One of our primary goals is to make it easier for our customers to eat the best diet possible. One of the aspects of a healthy diet is the daily inclusion of as many different types, colors and growth habits of vegetables as possible. As Goethe and Rudolf Steiner pointed out, plants and human beings are “divided” into three separate but inter-penetrating spheres.

For the plant, this means a root sphere, a leaf/stem sphere and a flower/fruit sphere. Separate activities and substances are active in each of these spheres, and, more importantly for us, each sphere nourishes a different part of the human being.

Root vegetables nourish the nerves and head of the human being. Leaves and stems nourish the circulation and breathing of the human being. And the flower/fruit realm of the plant nourishes our metabolic/reproductive functions.

It is interesting that many of humankind’s lasting and most important plant medicines take advantage of this way of thinking. Simple examples include digitalis leaves as a primary medicine for the heart, circulation and breathing. Another example would be chamomile flowers for supporting digestive function in small children. And finally, we all learned as children that eating carrot roots is good for the health of our eyes.

Countless other examples underlie this basic wisdom that consuming the three parts of the plant each day should be seen as a fundamental health practice.

Yet, life is busy, and we don’t always have the time to shop for and cook plants from each sphere every day.  Our Threefold powders essentially do this for you.

Today we are re-introducing our Threefold Blend (Slightly Sweet) Powder, made from the roots of carrots and beets, the leaves of Swiss chard and kale and the fruit of the butternut squash.

Each vegetable is cooked in a way similar to how you would prepare the vegetable at home, and each is organically grown. Together, they make getting your daily threefold-vegetable serving as easy as adding a tablespoon to your daily soup.

Please enjoy the Threefold Blend (Slightly Sweet) Powder with virtually any dish, and rest assured that you are being nourished by the three basic parts of the plant world.

Copyright © Thomas Cowan. All Rights Reserved.

DISCLAIMER: This article is not intended to provide medical or nutritional advice, diagnosis, treatment, promises, or guarantees. Consult your healthcare provider before taking action regarding any medical or nutritional information presented.

Thomas Cowan, MD, is the author of Human Heart, Cosmic Heart: A Doctor’s Quest to Understand, Treat & Prevent Cardiovascular Disease.

AFFILIATE DISCLOSURE: This article contains affiliate links. The Phoenix Center for Regenetics may receive a commission for purchases made by way of these links.

Featured Video ... Why Everyone's Leaving YouTube

2. An Open Letter on Internet Censorship by Dr. Kelly Brogan

Kelly Brogan, MD, KellyBroganMd.com


Hi there,

Many of you who have supported and followed my work for the past 6 years know that I’ve shared it with a fire in my belly and tears in my eyes. For so many years, I encountered moments where I felt I might explode from the overwhelm of what I saw happening to us at the greedy hands of corporations and the rotating door to our regulatory agencies and government officials.

This made it nearly impossible to connect to joy in my life, because the first inklings of it left me feeling like I was abandoning all those who were sick, suffering, and struggling. The truth is that I am far more able to help you, my loved ones, and myself, if I am calm, clear, and accepting inside.

So, right now, I am accepting that there is mass censorship afoot. Many of us have seen it coming, and now it’s a reality. My beloved partner, Sayer of greenmedinfo.com, lost his newsletter provider, MailChimp, after they sent him this message and closed down his account.

He pivoted towards a more like-minded option called Ontraport, and remains an unstoppable and intrepid supporter of the science of natural medicine.

Now, since June 3rd, we have witnessed an unprecedented decline in searchability through Google. Prior to that, kellybroganmd.com was averaging 225,000 impressions per month, and you can see that we have nearly flat-lined because our content is not findable without the use of the phrase kellybroganmd.com in the search.

For example, we used to have first page content for terms like “psychoneuroimmunology” or “gut brain.” And now we aren’t in the first 10 (I gave up after ten pages!) of Google.

Without ascribing an agenda to this Google algorithm update, it’s clear that sites like greenmedinfo.com, naturalnews.com, and mercola.com are having to reconsider how we can support informed consent and natural healing options because when you know better, you do better. Much of the science that we share is widely available in its published form; however, many rely on the democratization of internet information to help in the curation and interpretation of it. So now we have to get more creative.

What you can do:

1. Make new choices! Change your browser to Opera rather than Chrome and change your search engine from Google to duckduckgo.com or ecosia.org, which plants trees with their profits!

2. Subscribe to and open our newsletter! We periodically purge our list of followers based on open rates. In a time of so much information and overwhelm, you are voting with your attention. Stand with me and grow this movement of choice and a new story about health. Your digital vote comes with that email open and click!

3. Share our newsletter and our site. Here is the opt-in for family and friends who want to be kept abreast of the health revolution.

4. Remember what we do have. It’s so easy to focus on what is wrong and what is missing, and to project a dystopian future that will have us all huddled in a corner quivering. Resist the temptation. Look around you in this moment. Odds are everything is totally ok. In. This. Moment. Connect to that, feel that ok-ness because you can generate it in every moment to come, weaving a fabric of possibility that arises from that void of present-focused consciousness.

5. Know that I’m so grateful to you. Thank you for walking this path with me.

Warmly,
Kelly Brogan, MD

Kelly Brogan is boarded in Psychiatry/Psychosomatic Medicine/Reproductive Psychiatry and Integrative Holistic Medicine and practices Functional Medicine, a root-cause approach to illness as a manifestation of multiple-interrelated systems. After studying Cognitive Neuroscience at MIT and receiving her MD from Cornell University, she completed her residency and fellowship at Bellevue/NYU. She is one of the nation’s only physicians with perinatal psychiatric training who takes a holistic evidence-based approach in the care of patients with a focus on environmental medicine and nutrition. She is also a mom of two and an active supporter of women’s birth experience. She is the Medical Director for Fearless Parent and an advisory board member for GreenMedInfo.com. Visit her website.


3. People Who Support Internet Censorship Are Infantile Narcissists

Caitlin Johnstone


As of this writing, journalist Ford Fischer is still completely demonetized on YouTube as the result of a new set of rules that were put in place because of some doofy Twitter drama between some unfunny asshole named Steven Crowder and some infantile narcissist who thinks the world revolves around his opinions named Carlos Maza. It remains an unknown if Fischer will ever be restored to an important source of income around which he has built his livelihood.

Fischer often covers white supremacist rallies and counter-protests, and his channel was demonetized within minutes of YouTube’s new rules against hate speech going into effect because some of his content, as you’d expect, includes white supremacists saying and doing white supremacist things. Maza, a VOX reporter who launched a viral Twitter campaign to have Crowder removed from YouTube for making homophobic and bigoted comments about him on his channel, expressed concern over Fischer’s financial censorship.

“What’s happening to Ford is fucking awful,” Maza tweeted yesterday. “He’s a good journalist doing important work. I don’t understand how YouTube is still so bad at this. How can they not differentiate between white supremacist content and good faith reporting on white supremacy?”

I say that Maza is an infantile narcissist who thinks the world revolves around his opinions because it genuinely seems to have surprised him that good people would get harmed in the crossfire of his censorship campaign.

I mean, what did he think was going to happen? Did he think some soulless, multibillion-dollar Silicon Valley corporation was going to display company-wide wisdom and woke insightfulness while implementing his agenda to censor obnoxious voices? Did he imagine that YouTube executives were going to sit down with him over a cup of coffee and go down a list with him to get his personal opinion of who should and should not be censored?

Think about it. How narcissistic do you have to be to assume that a vast corporation is going to use your exact personal perceptual filters while determining who should and should not be censored for oafish behavior? How incapable of understanding the existence of other points of view must you be to believe it’s reasonable to expect that a giant, sweeping censorship campaign will exercise surgical precision which aligns perfectly with your own exact personal values system? How arrogant and self-centered must you be to demand pro-censorship reforms throughout an enormous Google-owned platform, then whine that they’re not implementing your censorship desires correctly?

This is the same staggering degree of cloistered, dim-eyed narcissism that leads people to support Julian Assange’s persecution on the grounds that he’s “not a journalist.” These egocentric dolts sincerely seem to believe that the US government is going to prosecute Assange for unauthorized publications about US war crimes, then when it comes time to imprison the next Assange the US Attorney General is going to show up on their doorstep to ask them for their opinion as to whether the next target is or is not a real journalist. Obviously the power-serving agenda that you are helping to manufacture consent for is not going to be guided by your personal set of opinions, you fucking moron.

The fact that other people aren’t going to see and interpret information the same way as you do is something Carlos Maza and the thousands of people who have supported his pro-censorship campaign should have learned as small children. Understanding that the world doesn’t revolve around you and your wants and desires is a basic stage in childhood development. People who believe Silicon Valley tech giants can implement censorship in a way that is wise and beneficent are still basically toddlers in this respect. One wonders if they still interrupt their mother’s important conversations with demands for attention and apple juice.

Ford Fischer was not the first good guy to get caught in the crossfire of internet censorship, and he will not be the last. In addition to the way unexpected interpretations of what constitutes hate speech can lead to important voices losing their platforms or being unable to make a living doing what they do, the new rules appear to contain a troubling new escalation that could see skeptics of legitimate military false flags completely censored.

“Finally, we will remove content denying that well-documented violent events, like the Holocaust or the shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary, took place,” reads a single sentence in the official YouTube blog about its new rules.

The sentence appears almost as an aside, without any elaboration or further information added, and at first glance it reads innocuously enough. No Holocaust deniers or Sandy Hook false flag videos? Okay, got it. I personally am not a denier of either of those events, so this couldn’t possibly affect me personally, right?

Wrong. YouTube does not say that it will just be censoring Holocaust deniers and Sandy Hook shooting deniers, it says it will “remove content denying that well-documented violent events, like the Holocaust or the shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary, took place.”

So what does this mean? Where exactly is the line drawn? If you are not an infantilized narcissist, you will not assume that YouTube intends to implement this guideline in the same way you would. It is very possible that it will include skeptics of violent events which the entire political/media class agrees were perpetrated by enemies of the US-centralized power alliance, which just so happen to manufacture support for increased aggressions against those nations.

Would the new rules end up forbidding, for example, this excellent YouTube video animation explaining how a leaked OPCW report disputes the official narrative about an alleged chemical attack in Douma, Syria last year? If you are not making the assumption that YouTube will be implementing its censorship using your own personal values system, there is no reason to assume it wouldn’t. After all, the official narrative that dozens of civilians were killed by the Assad government dropping chlorine cylinders through rooftops is the mainstream consensus narrative maintained by all respected US officials and “authoritative” news outlets.

This is a perfect example of a very real possibility that could be a disastrous consequence of increased internet censorship. It is a known fact that the US government has an extensive history of using false flags to manufacture consent for war, from the USS Liberty to the Gulf of Tonkin to the false Nayirah testimony about removing babies from incubators to the WMD narrative in Iraq. These new rules could easily serve as a narrative control device preventing critical discussions about suspicious acts of violence which have already happened, and which happen in the future.

Consider the fact that Google, which owns YouTube, has had ties to the CIA and the NSA from its very inception, is known to have a cozy relationship with the NSA, and has served US intelligence community narrative control agendas by tweaking its algorithms to deliberately hide dissenting alternative media outlets. Consider this, then ask yourself this question: do you trust this company to make wise and beneficent distinctions when it comes to censoring public conversations?

In a corporatist system of government which draws no meaningful distinction between corporate power and state power, corporate censorship is state censorship. Only someone who believes that giant Silicon Valley corporations would implement censorship according to their own personal values system could ever support giving these oligarchic establishments that kind of power. And if you believe that, it’s because you never really grew up.

This article, republished under a creative commons license, originally appeared here.

Caitlin Johnstone is a rogue journalist, bogan socialist, anarcho-psychonaut and guerrilla poet.


4. 11 Golden Rules of Militant Vaccine Pushers (Part 1)

Brendan D. Murphy, Global Freedom Movement

A Devout Vaccine Apologist’s Guide

“I have no faith in vaccination; nay, I look upon it with the greatest possible disgust … Indeed, I consider we are now living in the Jennerian epoch for the slaughter of innocents, and the unthinking portion of the adult population.”

Dr. W.J. Collins, MD, BS, BSc, MRCS, Twenty Years’ Experience of a Public Vaccinator, 1866. Printed for the Anti-Compulsory Vaccination League (And you poor sods thought this all started in the 1990s with Andrew Wakefield!)

Introduction

The vaccine situation is circus sideshow bizarre now because this great hulking mythology has taken on a life of its own, with such polarizing power that it simply never seems to occur to most proponents/adherents to actually investigate the subject independently and thoroughly for themselves—and so they don’t. (This means spending months and years, by the way, folks. It doesn’t mean spending five minutes perusing a Snopes article or some official government brochure touting the unquestioned “wonders” of vaccination.)

We’re talking swathes of medical professionals who are asleep at the wheel here. Despite their lack of personal investigation, they maintain a disproportional level of confidence in their views—exactly in the same way that a fundamentalist persists in their blinkered, dogmatic confidence. (No one can beat the “one true god,” after all.) Everyone around them is so cock-sure, so righteous, so smug, so authoritative—how could all those people and agencies (and all that tradition) be wrong? (Ah, the allure of “safety in numbers.”)

Establishment spokespeople and medical stooges currently refer to an imaginary “consensus” that the science is settled. (Where have we heard that before? Oh, yes, carbon-dioxide-emission-driven “global warming”—don’t talk about the government admissions of geoengineering though!) Thus there is no need to actually bother looking for evidence or consider another perspective. Only crackpots and conspiracy nutters do that. (If you’re already triggered by the term “geoengineering,” then please leave now. This article is intended for mature, emotionally stable adults.)

Conformity is next to godliness, slave, so learn the eleven golden rules of militant vaccine pushers and know your place.

1. The “Greater Good” Is All That Matters (a.k.a. The End Justifies the Means)

Militant pro-vaccinists are intensely collectivist.

So your child is autistic since they had the MMR jab? You lost your baby after the doctor vaccinated him/her during their last well baby checkup? You’ve had acute flaccid myelitis since your polio shot? Grandpa died after his flu shot?

Too bad. The herd needs protecting and sometimes the weaker members of the herd need to be sacrificed to protect the rest. Buck up, you’ve done your part for society! Doesn’t that righteous inner glow replace the touch of your never-to-be-held-again child? There, see? All better. (My sincere apologies to pro-choice parents out there who actually have lost children. I don’t meant to be tasteless, but I am trying to hold up a mirror here for those with eyes to see.)

Individuality must be sacrificed to the “greater good,” no matter the cost (consequentialism).

Ignore the fact that “herd immunity” cannot be attained through mass vaccination and that the idea itself originally emanated from the observation that natural acquisition of a disease strengthens the “immunity” of the “herd” in the long run and protects those at high risk of serious infection through the “herd’s” contact with the pathogen and resultant long-term immunity—which vaccines attempt to mimic but do not provide.

Ignore the fact that in the developed world measles mortality had fallen by as much as 99.6% before measles vaccines were introduced, while some other diseases, such as scarlet fever and tuberculosis in the USA, virtually vanished (certainly the mortality rates became vanishingly small) with no vaccine being adopted for them at all.

Ignore the parallel decrease in mortality between pertussis and scurvy in England, as seen below. Ignore that no vaccine was developed for scurvy, and disregard how pertussis mortality nosedived well before any vaccines showed up. Also ignore the many other graphs showing the same thing with other diseases.

IMAGE CREDIT: IMMUNIZATION GRAPHS: NATURAL INFECTIOUS DISEASE DECLINES; IMMUNIZATION EFFECTIVENESS; AND IMMUNIZATION DANGERS BY RAYMOND OBOMSAWIN PH.D., SENIOR ADVISOR – FIRST NATIONS CENTRE, NATIONAL ABORIGINAL HEALTH ORGANIZATION, OCTOBER 2009

Ignore the paramount importance of breast milk in protecting a child. Ignore transplacental immunity. Only synthetics and simulacra are acceptable. Nature is to be surpassed and beaten through the religion of technocracy.

Focus single-mindedly/devoutly on vaccines at the expense of ALL else. As in fundamentalist religion, militant vaccinists are monotheists—and there can be only one True God.

Ignore the mounting evidence that an antibody response does NOT confer any “immunity” worth the name and ignore the difference between cellular immunity and antibody production. Imply or claim outright that a robust antibody titer after vaccination means “immunity” has been achieved, even though the human immune system is vastly more complex than a simple antibody response. Try not to imagine how NASA’s mission to Mars might look if rocket scientists adopted a similarly simplistic and naive belief that, as long as the rocket has powerful thrusters, that’s all you should need for an “efficacious” mission!

The extreme nature of current vaccine ideology has led to the Biosecurity Act 2015 and other similar totalitarian pieces of legislation (see: GHSA) leading us to collective mandatory vaccination REGARDLESS of evidence of highly elevated risk for certain individuals and the evidence of intrinsic harmfulness of every single dose.

Policies of mandatory vaccination are policies of physical invasion and violence, and can only succeed if the psychological brutalization of society softens the public to the next uptick in tyrannical governmental operation.

A recent commenter on a Facebook thread I passed by quipped (and I paraphrase): “Not even the communists mandated vaccination!” He had formerly lived in a communist country. Yes, we are outdoing the ultimate collectivists with current vaccine fanaticism.

The fact that many people in the developed world openly welcome the idea of forced vaccination (and microchipping) demonstrates irrefutably that we have systemic Stockholm Syndrome and have bonded with our captors/abusers.

1(a). Censor All Well-founded Contrarian Viewpoints


The classic example is one of the moment: we have hordes of people—including the rather foolish looking head of the AMA (Michael Gannon, who embarrassed himself by referring to polio “bacteria” recently on Twitter)—advocating censorship of a film (VAXXED) they deem “dangerous” and have NEVER SEEN!

“Condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance,” Einstein observed. This advocacy is about as low and unconscious as cognitive function can get—short of being fully comatose.

“You really shouldn’t see that film, it’s dangerous and misleading, you know.”
“Oh, have you seen it?”
“Ah, no … It’s dangerous and misleading, so I won’t be seeing it.”
#PolioIsNotaBacterium
#NoLogic

2. Create (and Maintain) a Biased False Narrative as Context for All Vaccine Discussion and Tolerate No Deviation from Your Arbitrarily Set Boundaries

Leave no room for a contrarian point of view by making the sheer act of questioning any of the vaccine dogma seem to be “shameful” (sacrilegious) and so “absurd” as to be unworthy of anything but vitriol (ad hominem again).

Key: Use Orwellian NLP tactics like referring to the possibility of having two different perspectives available as “false balance.” (Balance is false balance, and ignorance is strength. See: double-think.) This makes logical fallacies so acceptable and commonplace as to be invisible. Use inflammatory, emotionally provocative language that defines anyone who raises so much as a modest concern about a vaccine as “crackpot,” “fringe lunatic,” “heretic,” etc.

Favorite phrases hurled by pharma whores include: crackpot, conspiracy theorist, tinfoil hat references, profanity in general, fringe nut, and accusing the “anti-vaxxer” of living in an echo chamber. For once Wikipedia is actually useful in clarifying:

“Observers of journalism in the mass media describe an echo chamber effect in media discourse. One purveyor of information will make a claim, which many like-minded people then repeat, overhear, and repeat again (often in an exaggerated or otherwise distorted form) until most people assume that some extreme variation of the story is true.”

Thank you, Wikipedia, for describing EXACTLY how the media, aggressive pro-vax trolls and government agents like Minister Hennessy work in promoting their distorted “vaccines are the best thing ever and only crackpots would ever dare raise so much as a whimper of doubt—oh, and Andrew Wakefield is Satan” narrative. Jill Hennessy’s wildly irresponsible and negligent claim that there is NO risk to vaccination represents just such an “extreme variation of the story” that emanates from the echo chamber of militant vaccinism. Evidently Minister Hennessy has never seen a vaccine insert before.

In the words of Dr. Toni Bark,

I began to see patterns. Children who were seen in the vaccine clinic would then come to our ER with seizures, respiratory arrest and asthma attacks. I began to realize, not all children respond well to vaccination and in fact, some die.

There you go: just one of the MANY doctors reporting the kinds of adverse outcomes listed in the vaccine insert. Denial is a nice place to visit, but …

2(a). Lie, Lie and Lie Again—and if That Fails, Lie Some More (In Other Words, Maintain the False Narrative)

Make grand, sweeping statements that a real scientist would never use, such as “the science is settled.” (Brian Hooker shows here that clearly the science is not settled.) Cherry-pick and acknowledge only that “science” which supports your view (chronically inflamed confirmation bias). Please note that this author had to overcome his own original confirmation bias in order to arrive at his current view. It is a task too few people accomplish because they never graduate beyond “thinking” from the limbic (emotional) brain, and looking coolly and calmly at evidence they fear will not simply fuel their preconceptions.

Lying by omission is often even more valuable than lying overtly. Sometimes the facts you leave out are the most important of all. There’s nothing quite like twisting reality to your liking by omitting inconvenient material—for example, vaccine insert information, toxicity of ingredients, failures of vaccine programs, the entire history and origins of vaccines, outbreaks in highly vaccinated populations, etc. Below are just two examples of the latter.

IMAGE CREDIT: IMMUNIZATION GRAPHS: NATURAL INFECTIOUS DISEASE DECLINES; IMMUNIZATION EFFECTIVENESS; AND IMMUNIZATION DANGERS BY RAYMOND OBOMSAWIN PH.D., SENIOR ADVISOR – FIRST NATIONS CENTRE, NATIONAL ABORIGINAL HEALTH ORGANIZATION, OCTOBER 2009

2(b). Implement the Hennessy Protocol (a.k.a. the Jenner Protocol)

Can’t find enough factual evidence to justify your loathing of the pro-awareness community and non-vaccinators? Worry not, because there’s always the option of MAKING THINGS UP AS YOU GO (a.k.a. the Hennessy Protocol—or “Jennessy” Protocol in honor of the founding liar)!

Yes, ladies and gents, Big Pharma agents and sellouts within the (highly incestuous) pro-vaccine establishment have resorted to fictitious Tweets converted from comments made in Facebook groups—all aimed at discrediting the pro-choice community.

Victorian Minister for Health Jill “No Risks” Hennessy has recently been busy “naming and shaming” so called “anti-vaxxers”  for alleged “abusive Tweets.” Hennessy’s narrative is that the comments were directed at her personally by “anti-vax bullies” on Twitter.

SOURCE: TRUTHLIBRARY.INFO

The Victorian Minister for Health used mainstream media outlets like the HERALD SUN (who are thus complicit in the fraud) to push this asinine story, but there’s only one minor problem: most, if not all, of these comments were never Tweets to begin with; some were comments stolen from Facebook groups and then attributed to another individual on Twitter, and some (at least four obvious candidates) may have simply been pulled out of thin air. See images below.

Some of Jill’s alleged “bullyers” were writing “Tweets” that were too long to actually be posted on Twitter (going over the character limit), and there is no shortage of confirmation that many of these fake “Tweets” were simply pilfered from a Facebook group which at least one well known troll apparently frequents. It appears that troll passed these comments to Hennessy and from there Hennessy—or her staffers—set about transforming these comments into “Tweets”, co-opting them into the Establishment’s line about “threatening” and “violent” anti-vaxxers.

If there is such a preponderance of anti-vax “bullying” and “abuse” going on, why the need to make up all these cases and distort reality? It’s a transparent attempt at vilifying and discrediting the entire pro-choice and vaccine awareness movement. (“A” for effort but an “F” for execution, gang.)

Why would such a SENIOR public official engage in such fraudulent behavior against the grassroots pro-awareness Australian community? Who is paying her? Is there a gun to her head? How has politics gotten THIS pathetic and rotten?

More importantly: Isn’t it time to start holding politicians like this personally LIABLE?

SOURCE: TRUTHLIBRARY.INFO

Here’s a good breakdown of Hennessy’s B.S.

To be clear: the bulk of Jill’s “Tweets” were simply comments made by frustrated observers—some of them likely parents with vaccine-injured children—among themselves within a vaccine-related Facebook group (see screen shots above). They were NOT directed at poor, mistreated Jill, nor were they posted on Twitter. There are even spelling mistakes in at least one of Jill’s replications not present in the original Facebook comments. (Yes, wow.)

It appears some disused Twitter accounts have been co-opted into this farcical narrative in the hope that no one would notice (including—ironically—a doctor in the Netherlands who actually supports vaccination!). Well, we noticed, Jill (and accomplices). No legitimate screen shots were ever provided by Hennessy. She simply read words off her phone/iPad and expected the public to lap it up (and the credulous pro-vax did indeed LAP it up).

The evidence does not favor her bogus “anti-vaxxers are vile” narrative—in fact, it indicates strongly that she has just defrauded the public with the help of mainstream media outlets in an attempt to demonize the pro-choice community—a large portion of which is composed of frustrated parents with a vaccine injured (or killed) child. Is THAT not vile? The hypocrisy is staggering. More victim blaming—this time from Victoria’s Minister for Health. (How Orwellian can it get?)

This is the same Health Minister who played a part in censoring VAXXED in Castlemaine recently, much to the outrage of the grassroots community seeking transparency and full disclosure. They were understandably irate that Hennessy had the gall to try and shut down VAXXED and then demonize them with this repulsive treachery.

Step down, Jill, you are not fit to play any part in politics whatsoever. (Sorry, is this a bit “abusive” for you? You could always turn it into a Tweet.)

On another note, you may have also noticed bogus missives written by people that claim they were once “anti-vax crackpots” but, after “seeing the light,” pulled a totes authentic volte-face. Once in a blue moon, this undoubtedly does happen, since parents who fall into fear and feel pressured will say and do irrational things (fear impairs reasoning and judgment faculties); however, a skilled pair of eyes with years of study behind them is well equipped to catch the canned, scripted, and staged “feel” to some of the recent examples doing the rounds (and emanating from some well-known establishment outlets, unsurprisingly).

Remember to ignore the fact that all pro-choice parents with a vaccine-killed or injured child were once “pro-vaccine.”

2(c). Blame 100% of “Anti-vaccine” Sentiment on Earth on One Man: Andrew Wakefield

This is the pro-vax establishment’s ultimate Strawman argument.

Refer to the “disgraced and discredited” Andrew Wakefield as often as possible—the more the better! Refer to the LANCET “retraction” as often as possible. Maintain the false mainstream narrative citing the “fraudulent study claiming MMR vaccines caused autism” (and congratulate Brian Deer on a [hatchet] job well done).

You can never overestimate the value of a good scapegoat, and the pharmaceutical industry has its Chosen One. This is also part of a distraction technique used to attract attention away from the MANY other doctors and scientists who are highly critical of vaccines for various different reasons. The illusion of a “consensus” must be maintained.

Doctors have fought against vaccine fraud and mandatory vaccination since Jenner’s time, for well over 100 years before Andrew Wakefield was even born, but don’t let that stop you from blaming him for every SINGLE doubt or query ever raised around vaccines. He’s the DEVIL and can bend space and time to his will, deceiving those whose faith is found wanting!

2(d). Blame Virtually All Disease Contracted by Anyone Anywhere on the Unvaccinated Population

Corollaries to this are as follows.

Ignore the high frequency of instances where primarily or ONLY the vaccinated get sick, and especially ignore the numerous examples of outbreaks that follow directly in the wake of vaccination campaigns. Failed vaccinations that result in the recipient/s developing the very condition they were vaccinated against are to be re-categorized and swept under the carpet. Vaccines simply cannot cause disease. Why? Because they aren’t supposed to, okay?! Because polio, mmkay?!

Absolutely disregard FDA and CDC and equivalent agencies’ admissions that certain vaccines produce vaccinated people who can shed and spread the disease.

Also do NOT read vaccine inserts that list side effects including the very disease they are meant to prevent, along with encephalitis, autism, seizures, death, and much more. Because they wouldn’t sell products that could harm us, right? (See: “cigarettes are safe,” “thalidomide is safe,” “DDT is safe,” “amalgam fillings are safe,” etc., etc.) The good old “they wouldn’t do that to us” is simply a fallacy born of misplaced trust. This is also known as misjudging the moral compass (or competence) of those in authority.

IMAGE CREDIT: VACCINE-INJURY.INFO

Especially ignore open admissions of there being no trials carried out that demonstrate effectiveness of, for example, FLULAVAL in reducing rates of influenza. Who needs evidence that vaccines actually work? They WORK, okay?!

“Shut up and get your flu shot because you’re putting my family at risk if you don’t!”
“But the insert states no controlled trials exist adequately demonstrating a decrease in the flu after vaccination.”
“You and your tinfoil hat conspiracies, crackpot! Stay away from my children!”

Find further examples here.

Don’t talk about the Cochrane assessment of flu vaccine efficacy. Ever.

2(e). Manipulate (and Also Use Bizarre) Statistics to Enhance Apparent Vaccine Value and Downplay Harm

This is an ancient strategy—an oldie but a goodie (with too many examples to cite here in this limited space). Has your patient just developed polio-like symptoms following the polio shot? It can’t be vaccines, they’re “safe and effective”— Priesthood of Medicine said so! Better report it under another name! This is a vital card in the pro-vax house of cards.

Think I’m joking? In 1960 the 120th Annual Meeting of the Illinois Medical Society featured a panel discussion, during which one of the medical experts named Dr. Bernard Greenberg (who would go on to testify in Congressional hearings)

revealed how data had been manipulated to hide the dangers and ineffectiveness of the (polio) vaccine from the pubic. Dr. Greenberg explained that the perceived overall reduction in polio cases was achieved by changing the criteria by which polio was diagnosed. Prior to 1954, all that was required was an examination on admittance and another 24 hours later; if the classic polio symptoms were discernible, the patient was considered to have polio. No lab test, and no residual paralysis were required to establish a paralytic polio case definitely. When the new criteria was established in 1954, for a case to be reportable as polio, residual paralysis had to linger for 60 days or longer. From this time onward, all cases in which paralysis lasted less than 60 days would no longer be classified as polio! Overnight, the majority of cases that would have been diagnosed as polio, were now shifted into a new disease category, cocksackie virus, or aseptic viral meningitis.

In Canada, the Dominion Bureau of Statistics issued an official bulletin in June 1959 titled Poliomyelitis Trends, 1958. “It may be noted that the Dominion Council of Health at its 74th meeting in October 1958 recommended that for the purposes of national reporting and statistics the term non-paralytic poliomyelitis be replaced by ‘meningitis, viral or aseptic,’ with the specific viruses shown where known.”

2(f). Introduce Bizarre Statistics to Sell More Vaccines (or Combine Flu Deaths with Pneumonia)

“[According to CDC statistics], ‘influenza and pneumonia’ took 62,034 lives in 2001—61,777 of which were attributable to pneumonia and 257 to flu, and in only 18 cases was the flu virus positively identified.” (emphasis added)

Oops. The above quote is from Peter Doshi’s report in the 2005 British Medical Journal. The CDC had been claiming that a whopping 36,000 deaths per year were caused by the flu. As you can see, there’s only a very SLIGHT difference between 18 and 36,000—only a few orders of magnitude or so. No big deal, right? We must convince the public they need to be jabbed using any means necessary. If we lie it’s only for their own good.

Why does the CDC combine these two conditions? Apparently, according to Jon Rappoport, they assume that the pneumonia deaths are complications resulting from the flu! It certainly makes flu sound a lot more threatening if you can connect it to 62,000 deaths rather than the meager 18 that actually were confirmed. It certainly sells a lot more batches of product if you can beef the numbers up with a little bit of reality warping.

Disregard the fact that this is the same organization that binned powerful evidence (see: William Thompson) that vaccines can and sometimes do cause autism. You can trust them. Got your flu shot yet?

3. Use Guilt and Shame as Techniques for Emotional Manipulation to Foster Acquiescence and Subservience

This technique rests on a pyramid of distorted and false information, i.e., the false narrative touted by the establishment about how vaccines are the greatest thing since sliced bread and how dare you question it! Questions kill babies, you Satanic bastards!

Basically, society (the brainwashed portions at least) inculcates into parents the baseless notion that they are delinquent in their parental duties if they are so much as a day late on the vaccine schedule with their child. Of course, parents who practice due diligence, and, after months or years of study, choose not to vaccinate are painted outright as child abusers—the evidence they cite is not worthy of study or discussion. Alternative methods of safely supporting health and immunity are taboo.

This is little more than another bullying tactic, a coercive technique consisting of low level psychological violence (with sometimes very high level resultant biological damage).

It’s the vaccine way or NO way. Thou shalt not worship false idols.

ABOVE: ONE OF THE MOST DANGEROUSLY MISLEADING ADS YOU ARE EVER LIKELY TO SEE. LEARN ABOUT THE SHOCKING CARNAGE CAUSED BY HPV VACCINES HERE. PS: CANNABIS OIL IS BEING USED TO REVERSE CANCER EVERYWHERE—EVEN “INCURABLE” LIVER CANCER.

4. Maintain Blanket Amnesia and Ignore History

The shorter your memory is the better. History provides a plethora of uncomfortable and embarrassing material that is not flattering to the pro-vax paradigm (to put it mildly). For example, Edward Jenner—the founding father of vaccination—was a liar and charlatan. He also became the most famous “refuser” of the early era of vaccination: his mentally retarded eldest son (who had been vaccinated for smallpox at 10 months of age) died in a sickly and weakened state around the age of 20 after having been vaccinated multiple times. Jenner chose not to vaccinate his second son.

The undeniably crude and unscientific practice of vaccination was opposed from day one by eminent medical men of the time on the grounds that it was dangerous and due to the observable carnage that followed vaccination wherever it went. (Did you know there were anti-mandatory vaccination leagues and societies in the 1800s driven largely by concerned doctors? Is Andrew Wakefield to blame for those too? Does he have a time machine?)

The Jennerian notion that people would not develop smallpox if they were inoculated with cow pox was ALREADY observed to be untrue before he started promoting this idea (which he “borrowed” from the local dairy maids!). Doctors at the time ridiculed his claims due to their observably false nature. People got cow pox AND small pox and this was common knowledge at the time. Thus, popular vaccine mythology is built on a foundation of sand/fraud.

ABOVE: AN OLD ANTI-COMPULSORY VACCINATION POSTER

Big Pharma, of course, was yet to exist, corporate hegemony over the education system (and research centers) was yet to be established, and thus, doctors in the 1800s were not all blindly indoctrinated into the pro-vax mythology—nor were their careers threatened if they did not toe the line. Times have changed drastically since then. However, while doctors today receive strong indoctrination into the vaccine mythology both via social osmosis and during their time in medical school, their curriculum features almost no factual information on vaccines, their ingredients, what those ingredients do in the human body, whistleblowers, disasters resulting from vaccination campaigns, vaccine history, general harm and risks, Big Pharma’s influence over the whole system (obviously), and so forth.

4(a). Ignore Chronology and Causality

Claim vaccines eradicated diseases that were ALREADY being controlled, declining, and/or virtually wiped out by the development of sanitation systems, improved hygiene, and better eating (and other developments like antibiotics). Don’t mention diseases that were conquered without any vaccines being developed for them at all. (See “scurvy” above.) Vaccines are our medical messiah sent from on high—from them all good things (and ONLY good things) come. (Amen.)

4(b). Ignore ….

…  crop of new vaccine-created conditions and diseases that arose in the wake off mass vaccination (especially the current autism explosion which is so dramatic that it simply cannot be attributed to genetic origins—because it’s EPI-genetic!). Don’t talk, for example, about how vaccine-induced polio has basically replaced wild polio. (And don’t mention the carnage left in the wake of the Gates’ oral polio campaign in India. Ssshh …)

To be continued …

Copyright © Brendan D. Murphy. All Rights Reserved.

This article, republished with permission, originally appeared here.

Co-founder of Global Freedom Movement, Brendan D. Murphy is a leading Australian author, researcher, activist, and musician. His acclaimed non-fiction epic The Grand Illusion: A Synthesis of Science & Spirituality is regarded as essential reading by many students of the physical and metaphysical sciences. Visit his website here.

Featured Video ... Tell No One (Documentary on the Catholic Church in Poland)

5. Reality Is a Function of State of Mind

Jon Rappoport


Reality is a function of state of mind.

As state of mind varies, reality appears differently.

Reality is not an illusion.  Reality is quite real when state of mind is factored in.

If someone lived inside a dream all the time, the space and things and events of the dream would be quite real.  However, if he exited the dream, reality would change radically.

Of course, there is the physical reality we all share.  It is not enough to say each one of us perceives that reality in a slightly different way.  For example, I said this in 2015:

About 12 years ago, I extensively interviewed Dean Radin, the author of a scientific classic, The Conscious Universe.

The interview confirmed and expanded on Radin’s published findings.  Here is the most accurate statement I can make about those findings:

Studying the entire history of paranormal lab experiments; selecting from that published literature all well-formed and properly conducted studies; Radin discovered that the overall statistical evidence was clear: paranormal ability was demonstrated beyond the factor of chance or the rules of probability.

Many of these studies tested psychokinesis, the ability to influence matter with mind alone.  In such studies, this ability exceeded chance or statistical probability as well.

Radin didn’t stop there.  Having done the exhaustive research, and having published his findings, he reviewed the major criticisms leveled at him by other scientists, and he responded to their detailed analysis with convincing analysis of his own.

In a half-sane world, Radin’s book The Conscious Universe would have caused a widespread revolution.

That it didn’t merely testifies to the hidebound preconceptions of scientific establishments and media outlets.
 
But the book did cause a stir with the public, and it most certainly registered with researchers who could keep an open attitude long enough to study Radin’s detailed work.

Here is one type of study that has been performed many times.  Volunteers are placed before a case in which there are numerous holes and pegs.  From the top, small balls are dropped downward.  The volunteer is asked to try to mentally influence the paths of the balls, so more of them end up in holes to the left of center or right of center.

The case is built so that, normally, half the balls would come to rest in holes to the left of center, and half to the right.

Analyzing the entire range of such published studies, Radin concluded that random chance, probability, statistical expectation had been exceeded.

Overall, the efforts of the volunteers to influence matter with their minds had succeeded.

To put it broadly, the limits of reality are not what most people think they are.  They extend beyond common consensus on what is possible.

The limits on us are not what most people think they are.

In his groundbreaking and shattering work, Radin met the challenge that many researchers sling at paranormal events: “If the events exist at all, they’re not repeatable, so they mean nothing.”

Radin’s method, the meta-analysis of many, many well-performed studies, showed that repeatability was, in fact, present.

What “Matrix-propagandists” never acknowledge—because it would topple and destroy the very foundation of their enterprise—is the capacity to direct non-material thought and, thereby, affect material events.  Under no circumstances will these “ordinary-reality” defenders ever admit that this capacity exists.

Copyright © Jon Rappoport. All Rights Reserved.

The author of three explosive collections, The Matrix Revealed, Exit from the Matrix and Power Outside the Matrix, Jon Rappoport was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for thirty years, writing articles on politics, medicine and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free emails at www.nomorefakenews.com. To read about Jon’s mega-collection, Exit from the Matrix, click here.

~

Subscriptions. Simply fill out our convenient subscription form. You will receive links to our current and future issues free via email, and you can opt out at any time. If you have a spam filter, please add This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it to your white-list.

Submissions. If you would like to submit an original article, excerpt, book review or letter to the editors, please copy and paste it into an email and send to This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it . Be sure to write
Submission
in the subject heading. We offer no financial remuneration for articles we choose to publish, but authors can include a bio and full contact information, including their website. While authors retain all copyrights to their work, DNA Monthly reserves the options to 1) edit any submission for clarity, length, grammar, and spelling; 2) excerpt portions of articles; 3) archive articles electronically; and 4) reprint popular articles in future ezines and on their blog. Please limit submissions to 2,500 words or less.

Mission. DNA Monthly seeks to empower readers with vital information relative to their genetic endowment: DNA. This information may range from generalized articles on DNA to news releases on breakthrough genetic research to educational materials devoted to specific DNA activation techniques and concepts. DNA Monthly is also committed to sharing articles and videos that promote healing, transformation, and awakening.

Disclaimer. The inclusion of articles, videos and other content in DNA Monthly does not necessarily denote or imply endorsement of such materials by the editors. The editors assume no responsibility, legal, medical or otherwise, for the information published as a free information service in their ezine. Articles, videos and other content appearing in DNA Monthly are not intended to provide medical claims, diagnoses, advice, or treatment.

DNA Monthly is sponsored by the Phoenix Center for Regenetics, facilitating conscious personal mastery as a bio-spiritual healing path through integrated DNA activation. For information on our unique products and services, visit www.phoenixregenetics.org.

 



Click on the slide!

Conscious Healing

Read the Book. Experience the Method. Activate Your Potential!

MORE
Click on the slide!

Potentiate Your DNA

Consciously Heal & Transform Your Life!

MORE
Click on the slide!

Activate Your Potential

Reset Your Bioenergy Blueprint.

MORE
Click on the slide!

Facilitator Certification

Become Certified in this "Revolutionary Healing Science" (NEXUS).

MORE
Frontpage Slideshow (version 2.0.0) - Copyright © 2006-2008 by JoomlaWorks










Save with Bitcoin


Save 25% on our products & services* by paying with bitcoin! Learn more here.
* Items with tuning forks not included.